Mark Karlin
Editor of BuzzFlash at Truthoutn his new book, The Case for a Maximum Wage, author Sam Pizzigati argues for limiting the income of the wealthy while raising the minimum wage. In fact, Pizzigati believes that narrowing the income gap is not possible without a limit on the highest incomes. In this interview, Pizzigati discusses the idea that the rich need financial boundaries.
Mark Karlin: We’re all used to hearing debates about the “redistribution” of wealth. You talk in your book about wealth’s “predistribution” — what do you mean by that?
Sam Pizzigati: Progressives have traditionally responded to wide gaps between rich and poor by calling for a redistribution of income and wealth — and taxes have usually been how we try to redistribute. We typically push for high tax rates on high incomes, then use the revenues these taxes raise from the wealthy to create opportunities for those without much wealth at all.
Back in the middle of the 20th century, this redistributive approach helped the United States become substantially more equal. [Because of these policies,] we went from a nation where the richest tenth of the top 1 percent took home nearly 900 times what the bottom 90 percent [of] Americans were averaging, to a nation where our richest few were only making 114 times the bottom average.
This redistributive approach assumed that high taxes on high incomes would always “fix” whatever inequality our economy generated. But the rich, in real life, refuse to cooperate with the fixing. In the last third of the 20th century, they pounded back against high tax rates. They used their wealth and power to carve loopholes in the tax code and eventually won huge cuts to America’s high tax rates on high incomes.
The result? We’ve become much more unequal as a nation. Our top 0.1 percent is once again averaging 900 times more in income than our bottom 90 percent.
What lesson should we take from all this? Redistribution alone can never be enough. We need to battle for an economy that generates less inequality in the first place. And that means working to identify the institutions and policies that funnel — that “predistribute” — excessive rewards to the already wealthy.
The wage and salary portion of our national income has been decreasing. What does this indicate about economic inequality in the United States today?
This declining labor share of national income — American workers essentially lost half a trillion dollars in paycheck income between 2000 and 2015 — reflects the power of the rich who control our corporations. These rich have no significant limits on how much they can grab.
Before 1980, big-time corporate CEOs averaged no more than two or three dozen times what their workers took home. Today’s top corporate execs routinely “earn” several hundred times what their workers make. They can make more in a morning than workers can make in a year.
Sam Pizzigati
POLITY PRESS
Major corporate enterprises have become the engines of our inequality.
Outrageously lush rewards like these give executives an incentive to behave outrageously, to do whatever they feel they must to hit the corporate jackpot. They’ll downsize. They’ll outsource. They’ll cheat consumers. They’ll even jeopardize lives — by unconscionably raising prices on prescription drugs people need to survive.
That incentive structure needs changing.
So how would setting a “maximum wage” fit in with this attempt to impact our existing “predistribution of wealth”?
In the United States, major corporate enterprises have become the engines of our inequality. The decisions that execs who run these enterprises make maximize their own personal rewards and leave most everyone else getting nowhere fast.
But imagine if we capped how much top execs could grab — and linked that cap to how much workers earn. Imagine a “maximum wage” that limited a company’s top execs to a modest multiple of what that company’s workers are making.
With this multiple-based maximum in place, top executives would only be able to make more if their workers made more first. These top execs, in effect, would have a vested personal interest in caring about the well-being of those they employ, not just themselves.
Explain how this notion of limiting the ratio between the highest- and lowest-paid earners in a company could work in actual practice.
This pay-ratio approach is already working in actual practice, and the best example may be in Spain, where the Mondragon network of cooperative enterprises — a significant contributor to the Spanish economy — has an internal compensation policy that limits top executive pay within an individual Mondragon enterprise to no more than six times worker pay.
Now we shouldn’t, of course, hold our breath waiting for corporate America to adopt a Mondragon-like standard. But we do have points of leverage over corporate pay policies, most notably the billions upon billions of our tax dollars that currently flow, year in and year out, to our biggest corporations.
These dollars come via different channels, most often through contracts to provide goods and services to government, or as tax breaks and subsidies for “economic development.” If we tied these tax dollars to corporate CEO-worker pay ratios — and denied these dollars to companies that pay their execs excessively more than their workers — firms that maintain reasonably small pay gaps between executives and workers would gain a competitive advantage.
Corporations with employment practices that discriminate by race or gender currently can’t get government contracts. As a society, we believe that enterprises that increase race and gender inequality should not get our tax dollars. Why should we let enterprises that increase our economicinequality get these tax dollars?
In The Case for a Maximum Wage, your final chapter details examples of hopeful efforts that are moving us toward a maximum wage. What makes you optimistic?
We now have a politically plausible path to a maximum wage. This year, for the first time ever, publicly traded US corporations must disclose the ratio between their CEO and median worker pay. This disclosure mandate comes from a provision in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act.
Corporate lobbyists fiercely opposed this provision and delayed its implementation. But now we have it, and the initial disclosures have been making headlines. One particularly striking number: Walmart’s CEO last year made 1,188 times the pay of Walmart’s most typical workers.
Numbers like that are getting people’s attention — and building support for the next step: placing consequences on these ratios. About a half-dozen states now have bills pending that would tax companies with modest gaps between CEO and worker pay at lower rates and give these fair-pay companies preferential treatment in the bidding for government contracts.
We believe enterprises that increase race and gender inequality should not get our tax dollars. Why should enterprises that increase our economic inequality?
The super-rich, in the end, have no redeeming social value.
And we already have the first victory of our emerging new era of “pay-ratio politics.” In Oregon, the city of Portland is now taxing firms with CEOs making more than 100 and 250 times their median workers at a higher rate than corporations with more narrow ratios.
Apologists for our current unequal economic order like to argue that the richer our rich become, the more they “give back” in so-called philanthropy. What kind of philanthropy do the rich tend to favor?
A huge chunk of that philanthropy goes to the alma maters of the rich, the private universities that cater to America’s elites. Other billions go into vanity projects — like new wings in art museums. In Los Angeles, for instance, we now have new private museums popping up all over while the city’s public schools can’t afford to pay music and art teachers.
Still other philanthropic dollars from the rich distort the democratic process. The think tanks the rich underwrite define the bounds of our political discourse. The “solutions” to social problems they trumpet conveniently leave our core concentration of income and wealth intact and untouched.
The super-rich, in the end, have no redeeming social value. We could survive without them. We could thrive without them. Social decency, most all Americans agree, requires a floor under income, a minimum wage. Social decency demands a ceiling, too.
Original Publisher
TruthoutMark Karlin is the editor of BuzzFlash at Truthout. He served as editor and publisher of BuzzFlash for 10 years before joining Truthout in 2010. BuzzFlash has won four Project Censored Awards. Karlin writes a commentary five days a week for BuzzFlash, as well as articles (ranging from the failed ‘war on drugs’ to reviews relating to political art) for Truthout. He also interviews authors and filmmakers whose works are featured in Truthout’s Progressive Picks of the Week. Before linking with Truthout, Karlin conducted interviews with cultural figures, political progressives and innovative advocates on a weekly basis for 10 years. He authored many columns about the lies propagated to launch the Iraq War.
You are my inhalation, I possess few web logs and sometimes run out from to post .
Greetings, There’s no doubt that your web site might be having internet browser compatibility issues.
Whenever I take a look at your web site in Safari, it looks fine however, if opening
in I.E., it’s got some overlapping issues. I just wanted to provide you with a quick heads up!
Besides that, great website!
Hey there! Someone in my Myspace group shared this site with
us so I came to give it a look. I’m definitely enjoying the
information. I’m book-marking and will be tweeting this
to my followers! Exceptional blog and terrific design.
If you would like to get a great deal from this piece of writing then you have to apply such strategies
to your won website.
Just wish to say your article is as surprising.
The clarity for your put up is just great and that i can suppose you’re an expert on this
subject. Well along with your permission allow me to grasp your feed to keep up
to date with forthcoming post. Thank you one million and
please continue the gratifying work.
Your style is really unique compared to other folks I’ve read stuff from.
Thanks for posting when you’ve got the opportunity, Guess
I’ll just book mark this site.
Hi there! This post could not be written any better!
Reading through this post reminds me of my old room mate! He
always kept talking about this. I will forward this article
to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Many thanks for sharing!
I like the helpful information you provide in your articles.
I will bookmark your blog and check again here regularly. I’m quite certain I will learn a lot of new stuff right here!
Best of luck for the next!
I’m not sure why but this site is loading very slow for me.
Is anyone else having this problem or is it a issue on my end?
I’ll check back later on and see if the problem still exists.
Hey There. I discovered your weblog using msn. This is a very smartly written article.
I will be sure to bookmark it and return to learn more of your
useful information. Thank you for the post. I’ll definitely return.
This design is incredible! You most certainly know how to keep a reader
entertained. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost
moved to start my own blog (well, almost…HaHa!) Excellent job.
I really loved what you had to say, and more than that, how you presented it.
Too cool!
Today, while I was at work, my cousin stole my iphone and tested to see if it can survive a twenty
five foot drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation. My iPad is now broken and she has 83
views. I know this is completely off topic but I had to share it with someone!
An outstanding share! I have just forwarded this onto a
friend who had been conducting a little homework on this. And he actually ordered
me dinner due to the fact that I stumbled upon it for him…
lol. So let me reword this…. Thank YOU for the meal!!
But yeah, thanks for spending time to talk about this topic here on your internet
site.
If you are going for finest contents like me, just pay a visit this site every day because it
presents quality contents, thanks
A fascinating discussion is worth comment. There’s no doubt that that you should publish
more on this issue, it might not be a taboo subject but usually folks
don’t discuss such subjects. To the next!
Kind regards!!
Everything is very open with a clear description of
the issues. It was definitely informative. Your site
is extremely helpful. Thank you for sharing!
It’s an remarkable piece of writing in support of all the web people; they will get
advantage from it I am sure.
What’s up colleagues, its great paragraph concerning tutoringand entirely
defined, keep it up all the time.
Hello, i think that i saw you visited my blog thus i came to “return the favor”.I’m
trying to find things to improve my site!I suppose its ok to use a few of your ideas!!
Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is a very well written article.
I’ll make sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful info.
Thanks for the post. I will certainly comeback.
My partner and I stumbled over here coming from a different page and thought
I should check things out. I like what I see so now i am following you.
Look forward to looking over your web page again.
If some one needs expert view concerning blogging afterward i suggest
him/her to pay a quick visit this weblog, Keep up the nice job.
Hi, all is going well here and ofcourse every one
is sharing information, that’s in fact good, keep up writing.
I’ve learn some excellent stuff here. Definitely value bookmarking for revisiting.
I surprise how a lot attempt you put to
create this type of wonderful informative website.
I am regular visitor, how are you everybody? This paragraph posted at this site is genuinely pleasant.
Please let me know if you’re looking for a article writer for your blog.
You have some really good articles and I believe I would be a good asset.
If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d really like to write some
content for your blog in exchange for a link back to
mine. Please blast me an e-mail if interested. Regards!
I was able to find good information from your blog posts.
Hi! Quick question that’s totally off topic. Do you know how
to make your site mobile friendly? My blog looks weird when viewing from my apple iphone.
I’m trying to find a theme or plugin that might be able to resolve this problem.
If you have any recommendations, please share. With thanks!
Hello! Do you know if they make any plugins to protect against hackers?
I’m kinda paranoid about losing everything I’ve worked
hard on. Any suggestions?
It’s awesome to go to see this site and
reading the views of all mates concerning this post, while I am also eager of getting familiarity.
Hey! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you
using for this website? I’m getting fed up of WordPress because
I’ve had problems with hackers and I’m looking at alternatives
for another platform. I would be great if you could point me in the
direction of a good platform.
You got yourself a new rader.
I was able to find good information from your blog posts.
Definitely believe that which you stated.
Your favorite justification appeared to be on the web
the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get irked while people consider worries
that they plainly do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top
and also defined out the whole thing without having side
effect , people could take a signal. Will probably be back to get more.
Thanks